[quote author=“Anonymous”]Sandra benchmarks:
CPU Arithmetic:
Drystone: 5108
Whetstone: 1654/2120
CPU Multimedia:
Integer: 11357
FP: 12523
Memory Bandwidth:
Int: 2195
Float: 2179
Cache and Memory Benchmark:
Combined: 3529 MB/s
Sony TX
Pentium M 1.2GHz
1.5 GB RAM
60 GB HD
Here is the T benches:
CPU Arithmetic:
Drystone: 5092
Whetstone: 1652/2104
CPU Multimedia:
Integer: 11292
FP: 12483
Memory Bandwidth:
Int: 2028
Float: 2022
Cache and Memory Benchmark:
Combined: 3247 MB/s
Sony T350
Pentium M 1.2GHz
1.0 GB RAM
60 GB HD
I guess some of you can continue to brag about the DDR2, 915 and how improved are the TXs over the Ts…. The TX doesn’t have HD audio and the InstantOn drains the battery fairly quickly, since it in performance mode all the time. The extended battery makes it a tank, and the SD is not that big a deal. I am not sure about the GMA900, but to sum it up, 80 pixels, shiny case and 100g less for yet another $2500. You can argue as much as you want, but my point is not that I have a T, rather that SONY have dropped the ball and all the new models are a ripoff. It is not so different technology. My argument was that sony needs to do something about this nonsense. Shinier case doesn’t do it for me to upgrade every year. If it was dual-core or had bluerey, it would’ve been a different story.