Well “guest”, instead of highlighting my so called failings why not just stick to the pro’s & con’s of the two systems.
Fact is I don’t see point in owning both & I admit both systems will have good & bad games.
Looking at all the factors both cost, design, technical abilities, track record etc, then for me the PSP is the one I go for.
The screen is light years ahead of any previous handheld console. I have tried the earlier Nintendo’s but screens to poor in my opinion.
On a final note design/ergonomics are important factors and I don’t “appreciate” the design of Nintendo console. I’m not really bothered what catagory of game player you put me in. I play games to have some fun not form a religious cult behind a specific brand.
See what you mean about battery life!! You have a point there!! Worrying.
Quote at forevergeek
“Real Sony PSP Battery Life - 2 hours?
November 02, 2004 | Category: Games | derek
Ken Kutaragi admitted in an interview with a Japanese gaming site that when playing graphically intensive games like Ridge Racer, as opposed to simple puzzle games, the PSP’s battery life may be considerably shorter than the initial estimates.
The original estimates were also figured with headphones rather than using the built-in speakers, the wireless networking feature turned off, and the screen dimmed to a certain level.
Looks like something fishy is going on over there at Sony. Ken claims that “in the future” as battery technology advances, they will revise the system to increase the battery life. What that means for people that may actually want to buy the system when it comes out, is up in the air for now. Just be warned that if you buy an early version you may be spending a lot of time next to a power plug.”
Merry Christmas “Guest”
