[quote author=“DayWalker1”]if you dont have WAN connections to route to/from and have less than Class C, you can survive with a static route to the next hop. There is no point for you to host the whole BGP table, neither to worry about AS’es for your OSPF’s. IGRP and EIGRP were supposed to be replacements for RIP, but IGRP has more disadvantages than advantages, compared to RIP and EIGRP is cisco proprieraty. Hope it helps. Make sure you configure the hold timers and the poison reverse/slipt horizon properly, if you have more than 1 internal subnet and you want to dynamically route them, although I recommend static routes.
Wow. Actually a very detailed and complete answer. People could say that the term “Class C” shouldn’t be used anymore since Classes were an old RIPv1 thing and today everything is about classless CIDR notation, but that would be splitting hairs. I must admit, I’m deeply impressed.
Thanks for the pointer to the access list article. However, I must say that I already know how to take care of access lists and indeed it seems impossible to insert or remove single items in the middle of an access list without replacing the whole access list and thus emptying it.
But I still have something to say about the X505 topic: different computers for different users. I am a TR owner and don’t plan to buy a X505 - and if I do it certainly won’t replace my TR. But the X505 is a very, very portable and lightweight computer for which I certainly would have some use for.
I don’t really know about the keyboard, so I can’t comment on this. I’m used to typing really fast so this would be an issue, yes. Then again, the only keyboards that really convince me are the old 80s IBM PC keyboards and some other keyboards from that time. I really never, ever, ever saw a really good keyboard on a notebook or laptop. Seeing how heavy and large the old IBM keyboards are I wonder if I’d like to…
However, the external optical drive wouldn’t be an issue if I would use the notebook for what it’s been built - as a highly portable subnotebook - just like my N505X was. Just because you are using the optical drive all the time doesn’t mean that everybody else does. And if you don’t use it all the time… well, the external drive will certainly be enough.
In fact, I would actually hate it if the X505 would feature an internal optical drive - that’s additional weight and additional size to carry around.
And the screen - no, the screen doesn’t suck at all. It’s no X-Brite but it’s still not a bad screen. It’s just your average notebook screen - nothing special about it, neither good nor bad.
So, no, it’s not a step backwards. The X505 is the first notebook which features a 10-layer-architecture on its motherboard. It’s the first notebook which is that slim and that light. The first notebook which you really don’t feel while carrying it around all day. My filofax seems heavier than that thing…
Granted, built in WLAN and Bluetooth would be a nice thing to add. A bigger and faster harddrive also qualifies as a good idea. But apart from that it’s a really usable piece of hardware.
Keep in mind that I am not an X505 owner nor do I plan to be one, so my point of view should be fairly objective.
Regards,
Julien